Blackjack Average Hands Per Hour

Blackjack Average Hands Per Hour Rating: 7,1/10 8216 reviews
  1. Blackjack Average Hands Per Hour At Wsop Main Event
  2. Average Number Of Blackjack Hands Per Hour
  3. Blackjack Average Hands Per Hour Blackjack
  4. Blackjack Average Hands Per Hour Live
  5. Blackjack Average Hands Per Hour Poker
  6. Blackjack Average Hands Per Hour Online Poker

Apr 03, 2013 Hands per hour can be dealer dependent as some are faster and more dexterous than others. Other factors are number of players at the table, side bets, players' decision times etc. I regularly play over 200 hands per hour one on one. Wong did some studies on this subject using Atlantic City six deck games. Average there is between 29-35, they post it on the wall to let everyone know there being watched all the time.I understand everyone thinks there doing 40 hands per hour but with this system it shows very few are. Thats great it sounds like you're getting a great value. $10/hand for 10 hours thats probably under $50 expected loss per day even factoring in playing an average of more than 60 hands/hour and factoring in all the extra bets you make on splits and double downs.

You’ll find dozens – if not hundreds – of casino games to play at any respectable casino. Most of them fall into a handful of categories, though. And the odds for each are different.

The odds aren’t the only thing that determines how much you’ll lose over time playing each of these games, though. The amount you bet per hour is the other big factor, and that’s determined by 2 factors:

The first is how much you’re betting on each outcome.

The second is how many bets you’re making per hour.

When you multiple those 3 factors by the house edge, you learn how expensive your favorite casino game really is.

How Much Does The House Edge Cost You?

The easiest way to define the house edge is as the difference between the odds of winning and the payout odds when you win.

For example, in roulette, the odds of winning a single number bet are 37 to 1. The payoff for that bet is 35 to 1.

The difference between 37 to 1 and 35 to 1 is the house edge, which is usually expressed as a percentage. That percentage is the average amount the casino expects to win in the long run for each bet that you place.

In the example of roulette, the house edge is 5.26%.

Mathematically, every time you put $100 into action at the roulette table, the casino expects to win $5.26.

Of course, that’s a long term average and an expectation. Actual results in the short term will vary widely from that.

For example, if you place a single $100 bet on a single number at roulette, you’ll either lose $100 or win $3500. It’s impossible to lose $5.26 on a single bet.

In fact, you can’t lose $5.26 on 2 or 3 bets, either.

It has to be a long-term average.

How Expensive Is Baccarat?

At an average baccarat table, you’ll see 70 hands per hour.

For the purposes of this post, I’m assuming that you’re a low roller, and you’re betting the lowest possible amount on the game. If you’re playing in Vegas, the lowest bet you can place on baccarat anywhere in town is $10.

This means you’ll put $700 per hour into action at the baccarat table.

What’s that going to cost you in the long run?

It depends on which bet you place. The house edge in baccarat varies based on which bet you’re placing:

  • Banker – 1.06%
  • Player – 1.24%
  • Tie – 14.36%

The smart player is only going to place the banker bet repeatedly, so his expected loss is 1.06% X $700, or $7.42 per hour.

As gambling goes, that’s pretty cheap entertainment.

Keep in mind, too, that real money baccarat requires no skill other than to have enough sense to make the banker bet every time.

But let’s see how it compares to some of the other games here.

How Expensive Is Blackjack?

Blackjack is well known for having the best odds in the house, but to achieve that low house edge, you must master basic blackjack strategy. That’s easy enough to do, though.

The best blackjack game you’ll find in Vegas these days has a house edge of 0.4% and a minimum bet of $5 per hand. Those tables are usually full, so you’ll probably only see 60 hands per hour or so.

This means you’re putting $300 into action per hour.

The expected loss per hour on that is only $1.20.

Even if you’re a bad blackjack player, you’re probably still not going to lose more per hour than you would playing baccarat. Even if you make lots of basic strategy mistakes, the house edge on this game probably won’t go above 2%, which is an expected loss per hour of $6.

So far, blackjack is the cheapest casino game you can play.

How Expensive Is Craps?

Real money craps has a wide variety of bets you can make, but for the purposes of this post, I’ll assume that you know enough to stick with the pass line bet – the most basic bet in the game.

The house edge for the pass bet in craps is 1.41%.

You can find casinos in Vegas with minimum craps bets of between $1 and $3. I’m going to assume you’re going to play at the $3 tables, because the $1 tables are crowded and also hard to find.

You’ll get 100 rolls of the dice per hour in craps, but only 30 of those will result in a decision, so that’s the number you use to get the hourly expected loss.

At $3 per bet, you’re only putting $90 per hour into action.

With a house edge of 1.41%, the expected loss per hour is $1.27.

Blackjack Average Hands Per Hour At Wsop Main Event

This makes craps just as cheap as blackjack.

Many craps bettors will have multiple bets operating at once, though. If you’re one of those, you might be putting a lot more money into action than $90.

How Expensive Is Roulette?

I’m going to keep using Vegas for these examples. In Las Vegas, most roulette tables have 2 zeros on them – they’re called American roulette games. The house edge for these games is 5.26%, which sounds high. In fact, you might think you’re looking at an expensive game.

You’ll be surprised at how affordable roulette can be, though.

It’s reasonable to expect to find a $5 table, and if you’re only placing one bet every spin of the wheel, you’re looking at 50 bets per hour.

That’s $250 per hour in action.

5.26% of that $250 is $13.15.

So far, real money roulette is the most expensive game on the list, but we’re not done yet.

Also, if you can find a roulette table where the minimum bet is $3, you reduce you’re hourly action to $150 and your expected hourly loss to $7.89.

How Expensive Are Slot Machines?

Slot machines will cost you more money than any other game in the casino, even though you can bet less on the slots than any other game.

That’s because the amount of money you’re putting into action per hour is staggering.

The average slot machine player makes 600 spins of the reels per hour.

Of course, you can look for penny slots, but even playing penny slots, you’re going to need to bet more than a penny per spin. They usually have a minimum number of bets that you must place on every spin.

Let’s assume that you find a penny slot machine where you only have to bet 9 cents per spin.

That’s only $54 per hour in action.

But a slot machine game with stakes that low is going to have a house edge on the high end – maybe 15%.

So, you’re still looking at losing $8.10 per hour.

And that’s playing for 9 cents per spin, contrasted with $5 or $10 on most of the other games I’ve discussed so far.

You’re more likely to be betting at least $1 per spin. That’s $600 per hour in action.

At higher stakes, you might cut that house edge to 8% or even lower.

That’s still $48 per hour in expected losses.

I just don’t have that much fun playing slot machines.

Also, it’s impossible to tell what the payback percentage for a specific slot machine is.

How Expensive Is Video Poker?

Video poker games look like slot machines, but they’re a lot more varied. You have dozens of video poker games to choose from, and most of them have multiple pay tables to choose from.

For purposes of this post, I’ll assume that you find a Jacks or Better game with a 0.46% house edge. The minimum bet per hand is $1.25 on this theoretical game.

You’ll probably make 600 hands per hour at video poker, too.

That’s $750 in hourly action.

With a house edge of 0.46%, your expected loss is only $3.45, making video poker a much better bet than a slot machine.

But keep in mind that other pay tables can result in a much higher house edge. In fact, video poker can be just as expensive as slot machines if you’re not careful.

Conclusion

How expensive did your favorite casino game turn out to be?

Blackjack

Average Number Of Blackjack Hands Per Hour

Were you surprised?

I’m a blackjack player, so I’m happy with my expected hourly loss of just $1.20.

I also love craps, and I don’t lose much more than I do at blackjack, so that’s awesome.

Your best bet is to treat your casino game money as entertainment money, and measure your enjoyment of each game as entertainment.

Blackjack

BETTING AT BLACKJACK

By Henry Tamburin


One of the most often asked question from blackjack players is 'how should I bet?' You've got several options and I'll discuss them in this article and offer my recommendation.


Flat bet

This means betting the same amount all the time. Most players don't like to bet this way because they figure if the dealer wins more hands then them they'll never win any money. Also players feel it's boring betting this way. They prefer the thrill of sometimes betting more in the hopes that when they do so, they will win the hand and make a nice profit.

Average number of blackjack hands per hour


Here are the facts on flat betting. If you bet say $5 on every hand in a standard multiple deck game the house will have an edge of 0.5% against the skilled basic strategy player. That means you will lose on average 0.5% of every wager you make. So if you bet $10 on every hand and average 80 hands per hour you will have made a total of $800 worth of bets. The casino expects to earn 0.5% of the $800 or $4.00. Of course the more likely result is that you'll win or lose much more than $4 after an hour of play. But on average you can expect over time to lose at the rate of $4 per hour.


Let's take an example of a player flat betting $10 on every hand. It's is a conservative betting strategy that leads to a relatively low theoretical loss rate. The fluctuation in this player's bankroll will also be low which means the likelihood he'll have a big winning or losing session is not great.


Progressive betting

This is where things get interesting. Progressive betting means varying your bets in some way from one hand to the next rather than always betting the same amount on every hand. There are all different types of betting progressions but they all have one common denominator. You either decrease or increase your next bet depending upon whether the hand you just played won or lose.

Average


Win progressions encourage you to increase your bet size after a winning hand. For example you make a minimum bet of $10 and if you win, you raise your next stakes on next hand to $20.


There are all different kinds of win progressions. The most common is a 1-2-3-5 progression. This means you increase your bet by the above multiples after each winning hand but as soon as you experience a loss, you start the progression over with a 1 unit bet.


Proponents of win progressions will tell you that you'll win more money if you win 5 consecutive hands compared to the amount you lose if you lose 5 consecutive hands. Of course what they don't tell you is that you never know when that 5 consecutive winning hand streak will occur.


There are also betting progressions in which you increase your bet following a loss. These Martingale type betting progression are dangerous and you never consider using them


There is also hybrid betting progressions, which have you increase your bets following a win, but after two or three success wins you lock up some profit and gradually regress your bets. The creativity of progressive bettors is never ending.


First of all, betting progressions do not change the 0.5% house edge one iota. There has never been a correlation between the hand just won (or lost) and you chance of winning the next hand. In other words using the criteria of the result of one hand (W/L) to base how you bet on the next hand has no scientific validity. So betting progressions in the long run don't work in the sense that won't improve your long-term chances of winning.

Per


But here's what betting progressions will do. First off they increase the fluctuation in your session bankroll compared to flat betting. This means you can win more using a betting progression compared to flat betting but you can also lose more. Secondly, betting progressions will increase the amount of money you wager per hour compared to flat betting. If a $10 bettor uses a 1-2-3-5 betting progression, his average bet will $20. Over an hour he will average $20 times 80 hands or $1600 worth of bets. The casinos expected win is 0.5% of $1600 or $8. In other words a $10 progressive bettor stands to lose twice as much per hour as a $10 flat bettor.


Here's a tip to save you some money in the long run if you insist on using a betting progression. Instead of starting your progression at $10, start at a lower amount (ie. $5). This will reduce your average bet to $10 per hour and cut you hourly theoretical loss rate in half.


But in the long run flat betting and betting progressions don't work in the sense they won't change the house edge against you and you will lose in the long run. So what betting system works? That my friends is as card counting.


With card counting you know when you have the edge based on the change in the composition of the decks and therefore you'll know when it's the right time to bet more. So unlike betting progressions that are based on whether you win or lose the previous hands, card counting is based on the mix of cards that were played on previous hands. If more small value cards were played in previous rounds, there are more big value cards left in the unplayed cards and the edge shifts from dealer to player. This would be the best time to bet more.


But I'm realist. Not a whole lot of average blackjack players have the time or mental concentration during play that is required to master one of the popular point count card counting systems. These are readily available in blackjack books. But even though millions of blackjack books have been sold since Ed Thorp's classic book, Beat The Dealer (circa 1962) first revealed card counting to the masses, the number of players who can successful win money in the long run at blackjack number in the hundreds and thousands.


So what's the answer to betting at blackjack for the average player? I asked Don Pronovost that same question about 2 years ago. Don is a software developer that markets blackjack training software (www.HandheldBlackjack.com). He spent the better part of 2 years and 36+ billion computer simulated hands looking for the solution to this dilemma. What he developed is nothing short of revolutionary - Speed Count.

Blackjack Average Hands Per Hour Blackjack


Blackjack Average Hands Per Hour Live

Speed Count is unlike any conventional card counting system. It's much simpler to master and requires much less concentration when you play. And unlike progressive betting systems, Speed Count will give you a verifiable advantage over the casino. Frank SCoblete and I teach Speed Count in a weekend course. For more information visit www.goldentouchblackjack.com or call 1-866-WIN-BJ21.

Blackjack Average Hands Per Hour Poker


Blackjack Average Hands Per Hour Online Poker

So now that you know the scoop on betting at blackjack, I wish you many aces and faces the next time you play.

Comments are closed.